This guy always lags >> behind with others when it comes to distributing the >> package. But why would it work after a restart of the SMS_Executive service, and then suddenly stop working? This new sender is configured to be able to send to 80+ sites concurrently with 3 sessions per site. Pierre 2005-03-09 02:40:44 UTC Christopher W. this content
Pierre 2005-03-09 02:40:44 UTC PermalinkRaw Message Yes and Yes.But none of the other sites I have append the (5) after the server name.Post by Jeff Harbaugh [MSFT]Please make sure you have Add accounts to respectivesitetositeConnection group 3. Very Computer Board index Systems Management Server sender problems sender problems by itsm » Sun, 02 Feb 2003 02:02:22 The Server in question is running on Windows NT 4.0 with SMS Quote:> The Server in question is running on Windows NT 4.0 with > SMS 2.0 sp4. https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/31d9f3e9-d966-4537-a62a-1c418b5f64a7/sccm-central-site-not-communicating-to-primary-sites?forum=configmgrgeneral
When you look at SMS Thread Utilisation in performance monitor ,its possible to trace the biggest culprits as being the sender threads (typically 50-60% of total smsexec processor utilisation). SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:52 PM 3188 (0x0C74) Connecting to C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\schedule.box\outboxes\LAN. PierreOne of my sites won't setup and the sender.log is reporting theError during connection to \\USWAL-SMS01\SMS_SITE (5)There is no existing connection, Win32 error = 5 5 Replies 7 Views Switch to He is Blogger, Speaker and Local User Group Community leader.
Error 240 is the session was cancelled. SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:42 PM 3188 (0x0C74) Connecting to C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\schedule.box\outboxes\LAN. This was found using NTDSUtil Ntdsutil Group Membership Evaluation Run domain.net Server-FB$ Reduce the number group to less than 1024, Reboot central and Primary site servers. To resolve this issue, we have used domain service account as Site System Installation Account instead of system account.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb680552.aspx Add service account as as Site System Installation Account. real time control positions available 9. SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:42 PM 3188 (0x0C74) No (more) send requests found to process. http://www.myitforum.com/forums/Unable-to-connect-Primary-Child-site-to-Parent-Site-m234848.aspx SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:46 PM 12216 > (0x2FB8) > > > > > Here is the sender log file from the child site: > > > > > Cannot connect to server
When I went thru the log I see the following > >> messages: > >> 1.There is no existing connection, Win32 error = 53 > >> Error during WNetAddConnection2 to \\XXX_XXXX\SMS_SITE This guy always lags > behind with others when it comes to distributing the > package. PierreYes and Yes.But none of the other sites I have append the (5) after the server name.Post by Jeff Harbaugh [MSFT]Please make sure you have an address account specified to the Pierre: "Re: Win32 error = 5" Reply: Gregory St.
SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:42 PM 3188 (0x0C74) > No site-specific sending capacity, so returning send request to the > pool. Mein KontoSucheMapsYouTubePlayNewsGmailDriveKalenderGoogle+ÜbersetzerFotosMehrShoppingDocsBooksBloggerKontakteHangoutsNoch mehr von GoogleAnmeldenAusgeblendete FelderNach Gruppen oder Nachrichten suchen Re: Win32 error = 5 From: Christopher W. Error During Connection To Server Sms_site 5 d. Pierre"
Notify me of new posts by email. news error = 0x8004100e SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER I followed the steps above to verify the correct secruity on the MicrosoftIISv2 namespace and found that the MicorosftIISv2 namespace did not exist on my distribution point! I thought these error messages can give some insight into why these boxes are getting backedup.my aim here is to see if not clean boxes(above mentioned) but reasonble number of entries/files I believe there a more ports that need to be open or set you firewall to accecpt and connection from the parents ip to the child and vice versa.
I hope this helps #7 CAP Total Posts : 143 Scores: 0 Reward points : 36530 Joined: 12/9/2011 Status: offline Re:Unable to connect Primary Child site to Parent Site Friday, SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:42 PM 3188 (0x0C74) > Abandoning send request because no site specific sending > capacity. Below is the sender log from the central site server: > > Waiting for new/rescheduled send requests, Maximum Sleep Time = 60 > minutes SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:46 PM 1188 (0x04A4) > have a peek at these guys Pierre 2005-03-09 12:47:44 UTC Gregory St.
SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:42 > PM 3188 (0x0C74) > Waiting for new/rescheduled send requests, Maximum Sleep Time = 60 > minutes SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:42 PM 3188 (0x0C74) > We have 3 active Exchange 2000 chande senders name 13. the 2 site servers are in separate, trusted windows 2003 domains.
Used 4 out of 5.18/04/2010 3:05:07 PM5468 (0x155C) Connecting to C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\schedule.box\outboxes\LAN.18/04/2010 3:05:07 PM5468 (0x155C) Retrieved the snapshot for priority 0, there are 0 files in the snapshot.18/04/2010 Urban (chris_at_learnsms.com) Date: 03/09/05 Next message: Christopher W. SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:47 > PM 3188 (0x0C74) > No (more) send requests found to process. John Marcum | http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/jmarcum | Marked as answer by veday001 Monday, April 19, 2010 5:10 AM Sunday, April 18, 2010 11:48 AM Reply | Quote Moderator 0 Sign in to vote
ID: 13MD9CTS, Dest Site: PS218/04/2010 3:05:07 PM5468 (0x155C) We have 4 active connections18/04/2010 3:05:07 PM5468 (0x155C) Checking for site-specific sending capacity. No account is specified to create address that means we are using default Computer account. SMS_LAN_SENDER 6/25/2009 4:22:52 PM 3188 (0x0C74) Found send request. check my blog PierreYes and Yes.But none of the other sites I have append the (5) after the server name.Post by Jeff Harbaugh [MSFT]Please make sure you have an address account specified to the
Anoop's says: August 6, 2012 at 9:59 pm / Reply Many thanks for sharing !!