On the remote server, run: $ bundle install --deployment Notes  For instance, if rails 3.0.0 depended on rack 2.0, that gem would still satisfy the requirement of rack-cache, which declares Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 136 Star 3,589 Fork 450 phusion/passenger Code Issues 163 Pull requests 6 Projects I have quarters and nickels, but not any dough Is the sum of two white noise processes also a white noise? How can I pass these flags into the installation process for those gems? have a peek at these guys
Please see the Bundler troubleshooting documentation at http://bit.ly/bundler-issues. Coul you help me? Can you try editing /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/phusion_passenger/loader_shared_helpers.rb? HTTPS Learn more about clone URLs Download ZIP Code Revisions 1 Stars 2 Raw gistfile1.txt 15:39:06,062 INFO [org.jboss.as.server] (DeploymentScanner-threads - 2) JBAS018559: Deployed "current-knob.yml" 15:39:06,639 INFO [org.torquebox.core.runtime] (Thread-109) Initialize? read review
How common is it to have a demo at a doctoral thesis defence session? Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. Bundler will transparently remember this location when you invoke it inside your application (with Bundler.setup and Bundler.require).
To tell bundler to use require "rack/cache", update your Gemfile: source "https://rubygems.org" gem "rails", "3.0.0.rc" gem "rack-cache", :require => "rack/cache" gem Bundler can run without connecting to the internet (or the RubyGems server) if all the gems you need are present in that folder and checked in to your source control. And even once you do that successfully, you would need to redo that work if you wanted to update a particular gem. Using dependencies like rack ~> 1.2.1 and versioning code in a SemVer compliant way mostly solves this problem, but it assumes universal compliance.
It was installed into /home/appname/www/shared/bundle Any pointers would be really appreciated. Can Communism become a stable economic strategy? You could no longer be sure that your application uses the same gems in production that you used to develop and test with. Thanks!
I'm wondering whether it would help if Passenger explicitly loads Bundler and Rack through RubyGems. share|improve this answer answered Dec 18 '13 at 10:21 sehnsucht 355 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign I'm not sure why /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/bundler is invoked... –sehnsucht Dec 18 '13 at 0:24 Check out the comments on the accepted answer for this question stackoverflow.com/questions/10574405/… even though your using The require rack thing isn't in loader_shared_helpers.rb.
Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Gemfile sintax error [closed] up vote -1 down vote favorite Please help me. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TORQUE-979 I have the same problem running Ruby platform on Windows. Error During Evaluation Require Qbundler/setup This can come in handy when adding or updating gems with minimal dependencies (database drivers, wirble, ruby-debug). I'm not sure what is going on to be honest here.
If you are having an issue you would like to report, please follow ISSUES. First, you declare these dependencies in a file at the root of your application, called Gemfile. Who owns genes? You specified: rails (= 2.3.14) and rails (= 3.0.0.beta3) /opt/redmine-1.3.2/Gemfile:79:in `evaluate' (eval):4:in `evaluate' /opt/redmine-1.3.2/Gemfile:77:in `glob' /opt/redmine-1.3.2/Gemfile:77:in `evaluate' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/bundler-1.1.3/lib/bundler/definition.rb:18:in `build' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/bundler-1.1.3/lib/bundler.rb:135:in `definition' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/bundler-1.1.3/lib/bundler.rb:123:in `load' /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/bundler-1.1.3/lib/bundler.rb:107:in `setup' /opt/redmine-1.3.2/config/../config/preinitializer.rb:16 /opt/redmine-1.3.2/config/boot.rb:33:in `load' /opt/redmine-1.3.2/config/boot.rb:33:in `preinitialize' /opt/redmine-1.3.2/config/boot.rb:15:in
Q: I ran bundle install --without production and bundler is still downloading the gems in the :production group. Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. Is it unreasonable to push back on this? http://invictanetworks.net/error-during/error-during-ssh-connection-setup.html Usage of the word "steward" Day and night I stand around Translation of "help each other" Can Homeowners insurance be cancelled for non-removal of tree debris?
Setting Up Your Application to Use Bundler Bundler makes sure that Ruby can find all of the gems in the Gemfile (and all of their dependencies). I don't believe --deployment works with gemsets People Assignee: Unassigned Reporter: Tim Olsen Votes: 0 Vote for this issue Watchers: 2 Start watching this issue Dates Created: 05/Dec/12 11:24 AM Updated: Bundler will not use gems already installed to your system, even if they exist.
Bundler member indirect commented Dec 30, 2015 @JyotsnaGorle this ticket was a problem with Bundler 1.2, and was fixed in Bundler 1.3. Verified This commit was signed with a verified signature. Now that your code is available to Ruby, you can require the gems that you need. Those files are specific to each particular machine, and are used to persist installation options between runs of the bundle install command.
Remember that you can always leave groups of gems out of Bundler.require, and then require them manually using Ruby's require at the appropriate place in your app. Anyhow, made it output the actual error and it is: Message from application: There was an error in your Gemfile, and Bundler cannot continue. (cannot load such file -- rubygems/format) (Bundler::GemfileError) And while an update from rack 1.2.1 to rack 1.2.2 probably won't break anything, similar scenarios can happen that involve much larger jumps. (see  below for a larger discussion) In news Skip to content Ignore Learn more Please note that GitHub no longer supports old versions of Firefox.
Since rails 3.0.0's dependency actionpack 3.0.0 remains compatible with rack 1.2.1, bundler leaves it alone, and rack-cache continues to work even in the face of an incompatibility with rack 1.2.2. It will probably fail if you update gems with significant dependencies (rails), or that a lot of gems depend on (rack). Embed Embed this gist in your website. Perhaps notable: when I comment out the Bundler line "require 'rubygems/format', that does help some.
I am running Redmine on Windows XP system. Again, imagine that you put rack-debugging in the :production group.