Home > Error Fix > Error Fix Asm Byteorder H To Define One Endianness

Error Fix Asm Byteorder H To Define One Endianness

Contents

Unfortunately, this clashes with glibc __BIG_ENDIAN and __LITTLE_ENDIAN macros that are in use for years. Visit the Trac open source project athttp://trac.edgewall.com/ Toggle navigation Toggle navigation This project Loading... Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison --- arch/avr32/include/asm/byteorder.h | 2 +- arch/mips/include/asm/byteorder.h | 4 +- arch/sh/include/asm/byteorder.h | 4 +- arch/sparc/include/asm/byteorder.h | 2 +- include/linux/byteorder.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 Reload to refresh your session.

I've tried different > stuff, i.e. Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 4 Star 3 Fork 0 DeltaResero/GC-Wii-Linux-Kernel-3.0.y Code Issues 6 Pull requests 0 Projects Download in other formats: Plain Text Original Format Powered by Trac 1.0.1 By Edgewall Software. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.6.29-* How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2009/03/msg00052.html

Error Fix Asm Byteorder H To Define One Endianness

Comment 8 Jarod Wilson 2009-01-07 09:04:28 EST Should be fixed in kernel-2.6.29-0.15.rc0.git9.fc11 (currently headed to the build system) and later. [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] Re: error: #error Fix asm/byteorder.h to define one endianness To: Luk Claes Cc: Debian MIPS , [email protected] Subject: Re: error: linux-mips [Top] [AllLists] next> [Advanced] next> Re: Problem compiling glibc from [Atsushi Nemoto] [PermanentLink][Original] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Problem compiling glibc From: Atsushi Nemoto Date: Fri, 09 Jan I'd like to get this right, and not just hack my way I suppose this patchset will fix this problem. (already mainlined) http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/6/341 --- Atsushi Nemoto [Morewiththissubject...] Problem

Home | New | Search | [?] | Reports | Requests | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] | Report Bugzilla Bug Legal Search: I can't build MPlayer because of that. We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox. Comment 9 Daniel Berrange 2009-01-08 06:10:32 EST FYI I just did a KVM build, with kernel-headers 2.6.29-0.19.rc0.git9.fc11 in the build root and it now works fine, so looks like this resolved

Probably > something changed in linux-libc-dev, though userspace should avoid using > kernelspace headers when possible AFAICS and should probably use > instead of . > > Should I file glibc build fails with: In file included from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:63, from /usr/include/linux/atalk.h:4, from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netatalk/at.h:25, from ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sa_len.c:22: /usr/include/linux/byteorder.h:8:3: error: #error Fix asm/byteorder.h to define one endianness I guess #include #include should I'd say the kernel, at least for #ifndef __KERNEL__, should use different macros than __BIG_ENDIAN and __LITTLE_ENDIAN (add __ at the end or something similar). click to read more undefing __MIPSEB__ and/or __BIG_ENDIAN if __MIPSEB__ is > defined.

Comment 6 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-01-06 20:09:45 EST My testcase: $ cat test.c #include #include $ gcc -o test test.c In file included from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:63, from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from test.c:2: Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: Comment 1 Gerd Hoffmann 2009-01-05 10:21:51 EST mock-chroot> cat test.c #include #include mock-chroot> gcc -otest test.c In file included from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:63, from test.c:2: Converted the arches in mainline that have already moved to the new header, as the other arches merge the will need simlar fixups.

  1. Thank You for Submitting an Update to Your Review, !
  2. Plus there are several nice little tweaks that can be made to alter the Windows appearance: removing the irritating shortcut symbol for one.
  3. As ever, thank you for reading!
  4. The command prompt registry restore saved my thesis and now my laptop is now booted up and running!
  5. You may well be met with critical error messages as Windows searches the registry for core information, but, if System Restore has been turned on there should be a point to
  6. Do you mean saved to hard disk?
  7. Similar to duplicate keys, the registry fragments when software is uninstalled, upgraded or updated.
  8. Addittional software can be opted out of during the settup, but is very annoying.
  9. The best bet is to not delete your entire Windows registry, srsly.
  10. I've used both ERUNT/NTREGOPT since 2004 without a single problem.

The combined header does checks within each function body and depends on only one being defined. https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.28/300-fix_byteorder_header.patch?rev=13876 Seems like I should get rid of > the initial definition of __BIG_ENDIAN (alt. __MIPSEB). Error Fix Asm Byteorder H To Define One Endianness But this > doesn't seem like a very good solution. Visit the Trac open source project athttp://trac.edgewall.com/ Search: LoginPreferencesHelp/GuideAbout TracRegister WikiTimelineRoadmapBrowse SourceView TicketsNew TicketSearch Context Navigation Back to Ticket #4391 Ticket #4391: 0008-fix-byteorder-problem-with-glibc-and-uclibc.patch File 0008-fix-byteorder-problem-with-glibc-and-uclibc.patch, 9.8 KB (added by Hauke ,

Kernel expects only one to be defined, while glibc always defines both (well, also __PDP_ENDIAN) and then defines __BYTE_ORDER to the one that is used for the arch in question. This is definitely a problem of the kernel headers. - Programs that FTBFS because they include . The problem is that the new kernel headers now use __BIG_ENDIAN or __LITTLE_ENDIAN macros to determine if target is big or little endian. Let's just stay out of userspace's way and use __KERN_{endian} The old implementation got away with it as it kept the two implementations in different headers and conditionally included the right

Let's   3just stay out of userspace's way and use __KERN_{endian}   4   5The old implementation got away with it as it kept the two   6implementations in different headers and conditionally included   7the You signed in with another tab or window. Can anyone > please advice? I > can't understand how I'm suppose to "fix" it.

Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. Sign in Matthias Reis / linux-m68k-atarinommu Go to a project Toggle navigation Toggle navigation pinning Projects Groups Snippets Help Project Activity Repository Pipelines Graphs Issues 0 Merge Requests 0 Wiki Network They could be fixed by switching to , but I don't think it could be considered as an RC bug, as the kernel headers have to be fixed anyway. -- Aurelien

Comment 10 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-01-08 16:45:33 EST It seems to be fixed, thanks.

But I still get the same error. > However, If I undef __BIG_ENDIAN in /tools/include/linux/byteorder.h > just before the check that triggers the error it compiles. Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug. Bug478663 - Broken linux/byteorder.h in kernel-headers-2.6.29* Summary: Broken linux/byteorder.h in kernel-headers-2.6.29* Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE Aliases: None Product: Fedora Classification: Fedora Component: kernel (Show other bugs) Sub Component: --- Version: rawhide Hardware: You signed out in another tab or window.

Reload to refresh your session. Next kernel update should get us the fix too. The combined header does checks within each   8function body and depends on only one being defined.   9   10Converted the arches in mainline that have already moved to the   11new header, as